【 RNI-HIN/2013/51580 】
【 RNI-MPHIN/2009/31101 】
25 May 2023
The Court granted a man divorce on the ground of cruelty after his wife refused to have sexual relations and cohabit with him.
The Allahabad High Court recently observed that if a spouse does not allow their partner to have sexual intercourse with them for a long time without a sufficient reason, it amounts to mental cruelty. [Ravindra Pratap Yadav v. Asha Devi]
While dissolving a couple's marriage on the ground of mental cruelty, a Bench of Justices Suneet Kumar and Rajendra Kumar-IV held,
"Undoubtedly, not allowing a spouse for a long time, to have sexual intercourse by his or her partner, without sufficient reason, itself amounts mental cruelty to such spouse...Since there is no acceptable view in which a spouse can be compelled to resume life with the consort, nothing is given by trying to keep the parties tied forever to a marriage than that has ceased to in fact."
The Court was hearing an appeal filed by a husband against the order of a family court which dismissed his divorce plea under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
He had alleged that after marriage, his wife's behavior towards him changed drastically, and that she refused to cohabit with him. As per the husband, although they lived under the same roof for some time, the wife voluntarily began to live separately after some time at her parents' house.
After six months of marriage, when the husband tried to convince her to come back to the matrimonial home to discharge her obligations of marital life, she refused to do so. In July 1994, through a Panchayat held in the village, the couple got mutually divorced after the husband paid permanent alimony of ₹22,000 to the wife.
Subsequently, after the wife re-married, the husband sought a decree of divorce on the basis of mental cruelty and long desertion. However, she did not appear in court despite sufficient service through publication.
The family court proceeded with the case ex-parte and dismissed the husband's plea, noting that there were no grounds of cruelty to grant divorce.
After going through the facts, the High Court remarked that the family court adopted a hyper-technical approach while dismissing the husband's case. It observed,
"It is evident from the record that since long, the parties to the marriage have been living separately, according to plaintiff-appellant, defendant-respondent had no respect for marital bond, denied to discharge obligation of marital liability. There has been a complete breakdown of their marriage."
The Court thus set aside the family court and granted the appellant a decree of divorce.
The appellant was represented by Advocates M Islam, Ahmad Saeed and Azim Ahmad Kazmi.
Agniveer Army Recruitment written Examination to be held tomorrow on January 15 at 3rd EME Center in Bhopal
NDPS ब्राउन शुगर तस्कर चढ़े इन्दौर Crime Branch के हत्थे!!
न्यू ईयर के लिए तैयार हो गए शहर में अय्यासी के अड्डे!!
7 IPS officers transferred in Madhya Pradesh, see list here
Damoh: CM Shivraj faces protest over not imposing lockdown when continous cases of Corona are to be found in the city
India’s Rank in Global Hunger Index reaches below Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka & Bangladesh
19 IAS officers transferred in MP, CM secretariat Koshlendra Vikram Singh becomes new collector of Bhopal.
DSP क्राइम ब्रांच आख़िर उगाई का हिस्सा किस अफ़सर को पहुचाता था?
After high -level drama, Congress face Gurjar finally elected as President; both husband-wife removed from Congress party
लोक सेवा केंद्र कलेक्ट्रेट भोपाल में कोरोना गाइडलाइन की उड़ रही धज्जियां!
Corona graph increases in MP, 1210 new positive cases within 12 days
164 new cases of corona virus found in MP within 24 hours
सब्जीवाला बना सक्रिय जासूस गुमसुदा नाबालिक को किया पुलिस के हवाले!!
तब्लीग़ी जमात को बदनाम करने वाले अवैध मेले का हुआ सूपड़ा साफ
Tragedy Strikes Krishna Nagar, Barkheda Pathani: Nursing Student Commits Suicide
Total Visitors :- 384651